IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick O'Neal Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 52 6 4 10 0.192 0.0549 0.0549 0.1489 0.1490
2018-19 Seahawks Hockey EHL 41 22 22 44 1.073 0.2303 0.2266 0.5255 0.5170
2019-20 Seahawks Hockey EHL 46 23 28 51 1.109 0.2379 0.2379 0.5429 0.5429
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 26 5 5 10 0.385
2022-23 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 28 5 12 17 0.607
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 23 3 6 9 0.391
2020-21 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 8 1 2 3 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2020-21 · Norwich
+177.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
20%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20981
Forward overall
#822
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt McPherson
Concordia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Leonard
Western New England · 2001-02
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Geisness
Concordia Wisconsin · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.