IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Otto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-12-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 45 23 40 63 1.400 0.1687 0.1679 — —
2013-14 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 44 24 47 71 1.614 0.1944 0.1859 0.5097 0.4873
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 24 11 10 21 0.875
2016-17 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 23 15 13 28 1.217
2015-16 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 25 9 7 16 0.640
2014-15 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 12 2 1 3 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2014-15 · St. Olaf
+63.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22329
Forward overall
#844
Forward born in 1993
#211
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean McKenzie
Suffolk · 2009-10
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Rosa
Babson · 2016-17
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Sloan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
0.529 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.