← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer DeRidder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-12-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHLP 36 21 34 55 1.528 0.1752 0.1793 0.3444 0.3524
2017-18 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 42 20 18 38 0.905 0.1187 0.1204 0.3072 0.3117
2018-19 Rochester Monarchs NCDC 22 3 4 7 0.318 0.1297 0.1255 0.2546 0.2464
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 11 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 14 1 2 3 0.214
2020-21 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salem State D1 MASCAC FR 23 6 6 12 0.522
2019-20 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 23 6 6 12 0.522
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2019-20 · Salem State
+393.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
18%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19276
Forward overall
#924
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2007-08
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.586 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.