IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nic Weight Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-12-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Marquette Rangers NAHL 61 25 15 40 0.656 0.2329 0.2349 0.6884 0.6944
2007-08 Marquette Rangers NAHL 55 21 12 33 0.600 0.2131 0.2045 0.6299 0.6044
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — SO 21 6 2 8 0.381
2008-09 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — FR 22 5 4 9 0.409
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2008-09 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+100.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4478
Defenseman overall
#707
Defenseman born in 1987
#1502
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dean Balsamo
Adrian · 2015-16
0.688 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marc Harrie
Concordia · 2007-08
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Kishko
Lebanon Valley · 2017-18
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.