IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Kishko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 29 34 36 70 2.414 0.2894 0.2654 0.5542 0.5083
2018-19 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 40 16 14 30 0.750 0.1009 0.0924 0.2553 0.2337
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SR 15 2 2 4 0.267
2021-22 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC JR 14 2 2 4 0.286
2020-21 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC FR 16 2 2 4 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2019-20 · Lebanon Valley
+80.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32550
Forward overall
#1401
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

James Hughes
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan MacIntyre
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Thomas
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.