IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Hughes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-01-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 48 3 10 13 0.271 0.1005 0.1028 0.2867 0.2932
2011-12 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 49 12 12 24 0.490 0.1819 0.1770 0.5186 0.5047
2012-13 Mason City Toros NA3HL 43 25 45 70 1.628 0.1962 0.1767 0.2647 0.2443
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen JR 21 4 2 6 0.286
2014-15 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 23 4 3 7 0.304
2013-14 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 14 0 2 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Superior
-5.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24395
Forward overall
#1065
Forward born in 1992
#2623
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joseph Giordano
Connecticut College · 2012-13
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Decker
Assumption · 2021-22
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Gullo
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.