← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Decker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 13 3 0 3 0.231 0.0650 0.0697 0.1869 0.2003
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 37 7 5 12 0.324 0.0914 0.0914 0.2626 0.2626
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 16 0 2 2 0.125 0.0352 0.0352 0.1012 0.1012
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 44 9 6 15 0.341 0.0961 0.0890 0.2760 0.2556
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Assumption D2 NE10 SR 28 5 12 17 0.607
2024-25 Assumption D2 NE10 JR 25 7 10 17 0.680
2023-24 Assumption D2 NE10 SO 30 13 12 25 0.833
2022-23 Assumption D2 NE10 FR 28 9 11 20 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2022-23 · Assumption
+926.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43270
Forward overall
#2006
Forward born in 2001
#1252
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2017-18
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2015-16
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.