IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charley Borek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 54 5 10 15 0.278 0.1035 0.0996 0.4048 0.3894
2016-17 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 45 14 20 34 0.756 0.2121 0.1999 0.6223 0.5866
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Tufts D1 — JR 21 2 7 9 0.429
2019-20 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 21 2 7 9 0.429
2018-19 Tufts D1 — SO 20 4 2 6 0.300
2018-19 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 20 4 2 6 0.300
2017-18 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 24 4 4 8 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2017-18 · Tufts
+143.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33632
Forward overall
#1433
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vladislav Sorokin
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ikki Kogawa
Wisconsin-Superior · 2023-24
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Kilty
Endicott · 2015-16
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.