IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Rutigliano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Northeast Generals NAHL 39 4 8 12 0.308 0.1142 0.1112 0.3258 0.3173
2018-19 Northeast Generals NAHL 54 16 15 31 0.574 0.2132 0.1981 0.6079 0.5648
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 14 1 1 2 0.143
2021-22 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 18 2 3 5 0.278
2020-21 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 25 5 6 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2019-20 · Skidmore
+214.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
42%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24027
Forward overall
#980
Forward born in 1998
#2547
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carson Kelley
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Luiten
Neumann · 2012-13
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivan Galaguzov
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.