IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Norman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 47 8 17 25 0.532 0.0641 0.0649 0.1680 0.1700
2015-16 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 47 13 29 42 0.894 0.1077 0.1037 0.2823 0.2719
2016-17 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 42 13 30 43 1.024 0.1234 0.1126 0.3234 0.2951
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 5 1 1 2 0.400
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 26 7 3 10 0.385
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 23 4 3 7 0.304
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 24 3 3 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2017-18 · Gustavus Adolphus
+168.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36949
Forward overall
#1671
Forward born in 1996
#1065
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chase Maxwell
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Phil Sbrocchi
Norwich · 2003-04
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Brandrup
Norwich · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.