← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Norman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 47 8 17 25 0.532 0.0668 0.0676 0.1679 0.1699
2015-16 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 47 13 29 42 0.894 0.1121 0.1080 0.2821 0.2717
2016-17 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 42 13 30 43 1.024 0.1285 0.1173 0.3232 0.2949
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC SR 5 1 1 2 0.400
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 5 1 1 2 0.400
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC JR 26 7 3 10 0.385
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 26 7 3 10 0.385
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC SO 23 4 3 7 0.304
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 23 4 3 7 0.304
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 24 3 3 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2017-18 · Gustavus Adolphus
+157.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28369
Forward overall
#1165
Forward born in 1996
#933
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2003-04
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.