IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Phil Sbrocchi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1983-01-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 37 3 11 14 0.378 0.1057 0.1071 0.2611 0.2645
2001-02 — OJHL 46 2 15 17 0.370 0.1033 0.0993 0.2551 0.2453
2002-03 King Rebellion OJHL 43 2 20 22 0.512 0.1429 0.1315 0.3531 0.3249
2003-04 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 35 3 21 24 0.686 0.1916 0.1677 0.4732 0.4141
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Norwich D3 — SR 29 1 14 15 0.517
2006-07 Norwich D3 — JR 25 2 11 13 0.520
2005-06 Norwich D3 — SO 27 1 13 14 0.518
2004-05 Norwich D3 — FR 23 2 8 10 0.435
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2004-05 · Norwich
+200.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6674
Defenseman overall
#867
Defenseman born in 1983
#2276
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Niko Happo
Manhattanville · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Bernhardson
Concordia · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Minerva
Neumann · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.