← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Gullo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 33 3 4 7 0.212 0.0593 0.0592 0.1464 0.1463
2013-14 New Jersey Jr. Titans EHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0268 0.0262 0.0612 0.0598
2014-15 Syracuse Jr. Stars USPHL-Elite 41 11 19 30 0.732 0.0877 0.0806 0.1680 0.1545
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 King's D3 MAC 24 2 2 4 0.167
2017-18 King's D3 MAC 24 3 7 10 0.417
2016-17 SUNY Brockport D3 SO 15 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 FR 6 0 2 2 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2015-16 · SUNY Brockport
+561.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44463
Forward overall
#1880
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2011-12
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.