← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Dowd Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Berwick NE-Prep 28 11 15 26 0.929 0.1872 0.1872 0.4250 0.4250
2019-20 Berwick NE-Prep 27 9 26 35 1.296 0.2613 0.2613 0.5933 0.5933
2020-21 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 19 1 0 1 0.053 0.0148 0.0148 0.0426 0.0426
2021-22 Seacoast Spartans EHL 46 11 21 32 0.696 0.1493 0.1415 0.3407 0.3229
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 24 1 4 5 0.208
2024-25 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 25 5 7 12 0.480
2022-23 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 27 4 2 6 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2022-23 · Salem State
+37.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31084
Forward overall
#1246
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Northland · 2015-16
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2008-09
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.