IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-01-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Brooks Bandits AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 Brooks Bandits AJHL 52 6 9 15 0.288 0.0968 0.0981 0.2670 0.2706
2009-10 Brooks Bandits AJHL 46 18 24 42 0.913 0.3062 0.2947 0.8449 0.8131
2010-11 Brooks Bandits AJHL 60 9 18 27 0.450 0.1509 0.1373 0.4164 0.3789
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Marian D3 NCHA — 24 10 7 17 0.708
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2011-12 · Marian
+313.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30647
Forward overall
#1120
Forward born in 1990
#969
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Lazier
Albertus Magnus · 2018-19
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Kent
Hamilton · 2021-22
0.793 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael McChesney
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.