← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Lazier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 37 4 21 25 0.676 0.0884 0.0855 0.2293 0.2217
2018-19 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 44 8 24 32 0.727 0.0951 0.0869 0.2468 0.2255
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC JR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2020-21 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC FR 23 4 8 12 0.522
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2019-20 · Albertus Magnus
+606.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23649
Forward overall
#1138
Forward born in 1998
#1668
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2017-18
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2001-02
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2006-07
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.