IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vince Guiducci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1981-01-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 King Rebellion OJHL 34 4 8 12 0.353 0.0865 0.0792 0.2430 0.2225
2001-02 King Rebellion OJHL 37 2 16 18 0.486 0.1192 0.1030 0.3350 0.2894
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 25 4 15 19 0.760
2004-05 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 27 4 13 17 0.630
2003-04 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 28 3 22 25 0.893
2002-03 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 26 2 10 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2002-03 · Wentworth
+423.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13037
Defenseman overall
#835
Defenseman born in 1981
#2637
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Charlie Ross
Nazareth · 2023-24
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Magill-Diaz
Trine · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Foster
Franklin Pierce · 2024-25
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.