IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vince Guiducci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1981-01-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 King Rebellion OJHL 34 4 8 12 0.353 0.0986 0.0903 0.2435 0.2230
2001-02 King Rebellion OJHL 37 2 16 18 0.486 0.1359 0.1174 0.3357 0.2901
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Wentworth D3 — SR 25 4 15 19 0.760
2004-05 Wentworth D3 — JR 27 4 13 17 0.630
2003-04 Wentworth D3 — SO 28 3 22 25 0.893
2002-03 Wentworth D3 — FR 26 2 10 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2002-03 · Wentworth
+358.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9776
Defenseman overall
#748
Defenseman born in 1981
#3108
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Magill-Diaz
Trine · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Vincent
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Catron
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.