← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Magill-Diaz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Northern Cyclones EHLP 11 2 4 6 0.545 0.0427 0.0423 0.1232 0.1221
2016-17 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 31 3 26 29 0.935 0.1122 0.1083 0.2148 0.2072
2017-18 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 50 10 38 48 0.960 0.2060 0.1926 0.4701 0.4395
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Curry D3 CNE SR 25 2 7 9 0.360
2020-21 Curry D3 CNE JR 4 0 2 2 0.500
2019-20 Curry D3 CNE SO 26 10 9 19 0.731
2018-19 Curry D3 FR 14 1 2 3 0.214
2018-19 Trine D3 FR 10 1 2 3 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2018-19 · Curry
+42.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8031
Defenseman overall
#1321
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2007-08
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.