← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Curran Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 50 12 37 49 0.980 0.3995 0.4280 0.7877 0.8440
2019-20 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 13 0 4 4 0.308 0.1032 0.1032 0.2847 0.2847
2020-21 Northeast Generals NAHL 26 2 18 20 0.769 0.2826 0.2826 0.8119 0.8119
2021-22 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 48 12 39 51 1.062 0.4332 0.4010 0.8540 0.7906
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of New England D3 CNE SR 21 3 6 9 0.429
2024-25 University of New England D3 CNE 11 1 0 1 0.091
2023-24 University of New England D3 CNE 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 University of New England D3 CNE 29 3 9 12 0.414
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2022-23 · University of New England
+17.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7894
Forward overall
#340
Forward born in 2001
#183
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2000-01
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2024-25
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.