IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Vincent Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Janesville Jets NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 — NAHL 37 5 8 13 0.351 0.1305 0.1331 0.3721 0.3795
2017-18 Merritt Centennials BCHL 30 5 4 9 0.300 0.1168 0.1122 0.4375 0.4203
2018-19 Janesville Jets NAHL 58 13 18 31 0.534 0.1985 0.1837 0.5659 0.5238
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 St. Thomas D3 — SO 7 1 3 4 0.571
2019-20 St. Thomas D3 — FR 26 7 7 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2019-20 · St. Thomas
+305.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24472
Forward overall
#1001
Forward born in 1998
#2634
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Keegan Bruce
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Hanewall
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2018-19
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wiggle Kerbrat
Wesleyan · 2018-19
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.