IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rick Schrank Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-02-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 37 8 7 15 0.405 0.0994 0.1022 0.2791 0.2870
2004-05 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 41 8 14 22 0.537 0.1315 0.1286 0.3694 0.3612
2005-06 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 39 13 10 23 0.590 0.1445 0.1360 0.4060 0.3820
2006-07 Milton Menace OJHL 23 4 4 8 0.348 0.0852 0.0759 0.2395 0.2133
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 27 5 4 9 0.333
2009-10 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2008-09 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 26 13 6 19 0.731
2007-08 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 17 5 6 11 0.647
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2007-08 · Elmira
+656.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38627
Forward overall
#1261
Forward born in 1986
#2416
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Michura
SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Gaven LaValley
Nichols · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Reed Rushing
Wentworth · 2008-09
0.552 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.