IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rick Schrank Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-02-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 37 8 7 15 0.405 0.1133 0.1165 0.2798 0.2877
2004-05 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 41 8 14 22 0.537 0.1499 0.1466 0.3703 0.3620
2005-06 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 39 13 10 23 0.590 0.1648 0.1551 0.4070 0.3829
2006-07 Milton Menace OJHL 23 4 4 8 0.348 0.0972 0.0866 0.2400 0.2138
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Elmira D3 — SR 27 5 4 9 0.333
2009-10 Elmira D3 — JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2008-09 Elmira D3 — SO 26 13 6 19 0.731
2007-08 Elmira D3 — FR 17 5 6 11 0.647
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2007-08 · Elmira
+563.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31307
Forward overall
#1157
Forward born in 1986
#2869
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Michura
SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Pappalardo
Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Simon Besner
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.