IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Michura Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New Jersey Rockets EHL 34 9 16 25 0.735 0.1699 0.1677 0.3598 0.3552
2016-17 New Jersey Rockets EHL 38 15 19 34 0.895 0.2067 0.1947 0.4378 0.4124
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Potsdam D1 — JR 26 2 4 6 0.231
2019-20 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 26 2 4 6 0.231
2018-19 Potsdam D1 — SO 17 0 2 2 0.118
2018-19 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 17 0 2 2 0.118
2017-18 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 21 3 2 5 0.238
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2017-18 · SUNY Potsdam
+51.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17103
Forward overall
#660
Forward born in 1996
#309
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Campbell
Marian · 2011-12
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Minerva
Neumann · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Williams
Hamilton · 2009-10
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.