IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reed Rushing Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-02-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Wasilla Spirit NAHL 14 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 60 3 17 20 0.333 0.1225 0.1245 0.3518 0.3575
2007-08 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 50 7 23 30 0.600 0.2204 0.2132 0.6333 0.6125
2008-09 — NAHL 57 5 17 22 0.386 0.1418 0.1301 0.4074 0.3738
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wentworth D3 CNE — 27 1 7 8 0.296
2011-12 Wentworth D3 CNE — 29 4 12 16 0.552
2010-11 Bowling Green D1 CCHA — 14 0 2 2 0.143
2009-10 Bowling Green D1 CCHA — 27 0 2 2 0.074
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2009-10 · Bowling Green
-51.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8341
Defenseman overall
#1081
Defenseman born in 1988
#3005
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonathan Horn
Tufts · 2022-23
0.867 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt McNair
Adrian · 2015-16
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Emoff
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.