| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Vermont Lumberjacks | EHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2017-18 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 57 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 0.298 | 0.0851 | 0.0815 | 0.2308 | 0.2211 |
| 2018-19 | Vermont Lumberjacks | EHL | 45 | 22 | 32 | 54 | 1.200 | 0.2575 | 0.2423 | 0.5876 | 0.5530 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | SR | 26 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 0.923 |
| 2021-22 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | JR | 23 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 0.783 |
| 2020-21 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | SO | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.250 |
| 2019-20 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | FR | 16 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.312 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.