← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Emoff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 57 7 10 17 0.298 0.0851 0.0815 0.2308 0.2211
2018-19 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 45 22 32 54 1.200 0.2575 0.2423 0.5876 0.5530
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 26 11 13 24 0.923
2021-22 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 23 4 14 18 0.783
2020-21 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 4 1 0 1 0.250
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 16 2 3 5 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2019-20 · Manhattanville
+105.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21776
Forward overall
#864
Forward born in 1998
#236
in EHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia Wisconsin · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.