← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Fauchoux Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 48 5 14 19 0.396 0.1143 0.1179 0.2980 0.3073
2013-14 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 53 20 18 38 0.717 0.2071 0.2027 0.5398 0.5283
2014-15 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 55 24 27 51 0.927 0.2679 0.2481 0.6981 0.6466
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 18 7 1 8 0.444
2018-19 Concordia Wisconsin D3 SR 18 7 1 8 0.444
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 26 4 5 9 0.346
2017-18 Concordia Wisconsin D3 JR 26 4 5 9 0.346
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 24 6 10 16 0.667
2016-17 Concordia Wisconsin D3 SO 24 6 10 16 0.667
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 25 4 11 15 0.600
2015-16 Concordia Wisconsin D3 FR 25 4 11 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2015-16 · Concordia
+204.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18538
Forward overall
#753
Forward born in 1994
#462
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.