IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Horn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 El Paso Rhinos NAHL 59 18 27 45 0.763 0.2709 0.2662 0.8008 0.7869
2022-23 — BCHL 51 11 11 22 0.431 0.1662 0.1516 0.6286 0.5734
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Tufts D3 NESCAC — 13 5 4 9 0.692
2024-25 Tufts D3 NESCAC — 15 6 7 13 0.867
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 5 0 1 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2023-24 · UMass Lowell
+18.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25320
Forward overall
#1420
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cody Ganchar
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2011-12
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Devon Rice
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivan Galaguzov
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.