IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Robertson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-02-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.2889 0.3246 0.7528 0.8457
2006-07 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 69 37 27 64 0.927 0.4510 0.4449 2.2638 2.2332
2007-08 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 72 27 32 59 0.819 0.3984 0.3726 2.0000 1.8705
2008-09 — WHL 68 26 29 55 0.809 0.3932 0.3483 1.9741 1.7485
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Ferris State D1 WCHA SR 41 7 12 19 0.463
2014-15 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 34 6 17 23 0.676
2010-11 Suffolk D3 — SO 16 1 7 8 0.500
2009-10 Suffolk D3 — FR 25 4 6 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2009-10 · Suffolk
+30.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5080
Forward overall
#231
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Kneeland
Lake Forest · 2004-05
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Loza
Suffolk · 2001-02
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.