IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Turner Richards Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Winchendon NE-Prep 24 6 9 15 0.625 0.1260 0.1260 0.2861 0.2861
2022-23 — BCHL 44 4 7 11 0.250 0.0973 0.0981 0.3646 0.3677
2023-24 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Boston Jr. Rangers NCDC 53 18 23 41 0.774 0.2180 0.2033 0.6263 0.5840
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 19 2 6 8 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2025-26 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+205.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24319
Forward overall
#1206
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vladislav Sorokin
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Franco Loparco
Concordia Wisconsin · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Sherer
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.