IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Sardina Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-12-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 48 5 2 7 0.146 0.0541 0.0576 0.1544 0.1645
2015-16 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 58 12 17 29 0.500 0.1857 0.1896 0.5294 0.5405
2016-17 — NAHL 51 6 15 21 0.412 0.1529 0.1478 0.4360 0.4214
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 27 6 15 21 0.778
2018-19 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 28 10 10 20 0.714
2017-18 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 27 9 7 16 0.593
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2017-18 · Lake Forest
+320.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29294
Forward overall
#1262
Forward born in 1996
#3468
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Klippenstein
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Reid Russell
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Thompson
St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.767 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.