IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Sardina Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-12-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 48 5 2 7 0.146 0.0536 0.0571 0.1539 0.1639
2015-16 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 58 12 17 29 0.500 0.1837 0.1875 0.5278 0.5389
2016-17 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 51 6 15 21 0.412 0.1513 0.1462 0.4346 0.4201
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 27 6 15 21 0.778
2018-19 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 28 10 10 20 0.714
2017-18 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 27 9 7 16 0.593
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2017-18 · Lake Forest
+325.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36300
Forward overall
#1565
Forward born in 1996
#3688
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Klippenstein
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dustin Skinner
Nichols · 2007-08
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Wisely
Hamline · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.