← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Wisely Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-12-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Peoria Mustangs NA3HL 29 3 2 5 0.172 0.0208 0.0248 0.0545 0.0650
2012-13 Peoria Mustangs NA3HL 44 7 14 21 0.477 0.0575 0.0657 0.1508 0.1724
2013-14 Peoria Mustangs NA3HL 45 13 15 28 0.622 0.0750 0.0828 0.1966 0.2171
2014-15 Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees NAHL 13 1 1 2 0.154 0.0571 0.0607 0.1628 0.1731
2015-16 Peoria Mustangs NA3HL 33 35 24 59 1.788 0.2154 0.2168
2016-17 Peoria Mustangs NA3HL 39 23 31 54 1.385 0.1668 0.1595 0.4374 0.4182
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 6 1 0 1 0.167
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 25 1 4 5 0.200
2018-19 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 25 2 3 5 0.200
2017-18 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 20 0 6 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2017-18 · Hamline
+92.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26406
Forward overall
#1125
Forward born in 1996
#351
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2007-08
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2003-04
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.