| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Peoria Mustangs | NA3HL | 29 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.172 | 0.0216 | 0.0258 | 0.0544 | 0.0649 |
| 2012-13 | Peoria Mustangs | NA3HL | 44 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 0.477 | 0.0599 | 0.0685 | 0.1507 | 0.1723 |
| 2013-14 | Peoria Mustangs | NA3HL | 45 | 13 | 15 | 28 | 0.622 | 0.0781 | 0.0863 | 0.1964 | 0.2169 |
| 2014-15 | Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees | NAHL | 13 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.154 | 0.0565 | 0.0601 | 0.1623 | 0.1726 |
| 2015-16 | Peoria Mustangs | NA3HL | 33 | 35 | 24 | 59 | 1.788 | 0.2244 | 0.2259 | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Peoria Mustangs | NA3HL | 39 | 23 | 31 | 54 | 1.385 | 0.1738 | 0.1662 | 0.4371 | 0.4179 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Hamline | D1 | MIAC | SR | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.167 |
| 2020-21 | Hamline | D3 | MIAC | SR | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.167 |
| 2019-20 | Hamline | D1 | MIAC | JR | 25 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.200 |
| 2019-20 | Hamline | D3 | MIAC | JR | 25 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.200 |
| 2018-19 | Hamline | D1 | MIAC | SO | 25 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.200 |
| 2018-19 | Hamline | D3 | MIAC | SO | 25 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.200 |
| 2017-18 | Hamline | D3 | MIAC | FR | 20 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.300 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.