icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Canmore Eagles | AJHL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Fort McMurray Oil Barons | AJHL | 28 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 0.893 | 0.2995 | 0.3012 | 0.8263 | 0.8309 |
| 2013-14 | Fort McMurray Oil Barons | AJHL | 31 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 0.742 | 0.2488 | 0.2373 | 0.6866 | 0.6549 |
| 2014-15 | — | AJHL | 44 | 12 | 18 | 30 | 0.682 | 0.2287 | 0.2060 | 0.6309 | 0.5682 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | — | 10 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.400 |
| 2016-17 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | BigTen | SO | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.111 |
| 2015-16 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | — | 27 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 0.667 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.