IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rob MacIntyre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-02-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Crowsnest Pass Timberwolves AJHL 58 7 22 29 0.500 0.1677 0.1687 0.4612 0.4639
2003-04 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 31 4 22 26 0.839 0.3232 0.3100 1.2187 1.1689
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SR 22 2 2 4 0.182
2006-07 Middlebury D3 NESCAC JR 16 3 6 9 0.562
2005-06 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 28 3 23 26 0.929
2004-05 Middlebury D3 NESCAC FR 26 5 3 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2004-05 · Middlebury
+28.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5629
Defenseman overall
#720
Defenseman born in 1984

D1 Comparables

Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Douglas Elgstam
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Dawes
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Payden Benning
Curry · 2007-08
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.