icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | Trail Smoke Eaters | BCHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2004-05 | Powell River Kings | BCHL | 29 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.172 | 0.0671 | 0.0709 | 0.2514 | 0.2656 |
| 2005-06 | Powell River Kings | BCHL | 42 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 0.429 | 0.1668 | 0.1679 | 0.6250 | 0.6290 |
| 2006-07 | Powell River Kings | BCHL | 60 | 20 | 38 | 58 | 0.967 | 0.3762 | 0.3585 | 1.4097 | 1.3432 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Tufts | D3 | — | JR | 23 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.609 |
| 2008-09 | Tufts | D3 | — | SO | 10 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.700 |
| 2007-08 | Tufts | D3 | — | FR | 24 | 3 | 13 | 16 | 0.667 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.