← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colton Beck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-06-10 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Ilves · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Langley Rivermen BCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Langley Rivermen BCHL 46 4 6 10 0.217 0.0838 0.0899 0.3168 0.3398
2008-09 Langley Rivermen BCHL 56 33 25 58 1.036 0.3991 0.4113 1.5091 1.5552
2009-10 Langley Rivermen BCHL 60 39 47 86 1.433 0.5523 0.5390 2.0885 2.0383
2021-22 Ilves Liiga 7 1 2 3 0.429 1.0715 0.7465
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA 37 14 25 39 1.054
2012-13 Alaska Fairbanks D1 35 11 10 21 0.600
2011-12 Alaska Fairbanks D1 36 13 12 25 0.694
2010-11 Alaska Fairbanks D1 38 4 12 16 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2010-11 · Alaska Fairbanks
0.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.