| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Penticton Vees | BCHL | 60 | 32 | 35 | 67 | 1.117 | 0.4160 | 0.4131 | 1.6271 | 1.6159 |
| 2013-14 | Ässät | Liiga | 28 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 0.464 | 1.1607 | 1.2718 | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Ässät | Liiga | 10 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.300 | 0.7500 | 0.7597 | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Ravensburg Towerstars | DEL2 | 40 | 37 | 18 | 55 | 1.375 | 0.5932 | 0.6433 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | — | 39 | 36 | 21 | 57 | 1.462 |
| 2010-11 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | — | 41 | 10 | 21 | 31 | 0.756 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.