IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johnny Van Siclen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 — BCHL 54 10 16 26 0.481 0.1855 0.1879 0.7016 0.7105
2008-09 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 6 0 5 5 0.833 0.3211 0.3117 1.2142 1.1787
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Amherst D3 NESCAC GR 23 14 12 26 1.130
2011-12 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 22 10 8 18 0.818
2010-11 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 8 0 2 2 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2010-11 · Amherst
+11.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31434
Forward overall
#1029
Forward born in 1989
#1768
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Ramm
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Dawes
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Fuss
New England · 2017-18
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.