← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Ramm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Northeast Generals NA3HL 14 8 11 19 1.357 0.1635 0.1635 0.4287 0.4287
2021-22 Northeast Generals NAHL 10 1 0 1 0.100 0.0371 0.0387 0.1059 0.1104
2022-23 Northeast Generals NAHL 39 6 3 9 0.231 0.0857 0.0851 0.2444 0.2427
2023-24 Northeast Generals NAHL 58 14 10 24 0.414 0.1536 0.1452 0.4381 0.4141
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 13 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 17 8 2 10 0.588
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2024-25 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+467.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36842
Forward overall
#1842
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Albertus Magnus · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.