IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Rose Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Coquitlam Express BCHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1946 0.1999 0.7291 0.7490
2015-16 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 50 6 20 26 0.520 0.1502 0.1476 0.3915 0.3848
2016-17 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 50 24 22 46 0.920 0.2658 0.2480 0.6926 0.6463
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 12 6 2 8 0.667
2019-20 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 26 12 6 18 0.692
2018-19 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 21 12 9 21 1.000
2017-18 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 20 5 4 9 0.450
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2017-18 · St. Scholastica
+153.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17982
Forward overall
#737
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Menzies
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Francone
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Giorgio
Bethel · 2018-19
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.