IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brent Bisdee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-04-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Navan Grads CCHL 60 9 15 24 0.400 0.0868 0.0913 0.3095 0.3257
2009-10 Navan Grads CCHL 57 15 23 38 0.667 0.1446 0.1455 0.5158 0.5190
2010-11 Kanata Stallions CCHL 62 31 23 54 0.871 0.1889 0.1807 0.6739 0.6447
2011-12 Kanata Stallions CCHL 54 30 28 58 1.074 0.2330 0.2110 0.8310 0.7524
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 9 0 4 4 0.444
2012-13 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 13 2 3 5 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2012-13 · SUNY Geneseo
+126.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16775
Forward overall
#636
Forward born in 1991
#232
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Roman Gaudet
SUNY Morrisville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Keegan Milligan
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.781 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Laplante
New England College · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.