IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brent Bisdee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-04-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Navan Grads CCHL 60 9 15 24 0.400 0.1142 0.1202 0.3096 0.3258
2009-10 Navan Grads CCHL 57 15 23 38 0.667 0.1903 0.1915 0.5161 0.5193
2010-11 Kanata Stallions CCHL 62 31 23 54 0.871 0.2486 0.2378 0.6742 0.6450
2011-12 Kanata Stallions CCHL 54 30 28 58 1.074 0.3065 0.2775 0.8315 0.7529
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 9 0 4 4 0.444
2012-13 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 13 2 3 5 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2012-13 · SUNY Geneseo
+71.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13479
Forward overall
#513
Forward born in 1991
#299
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Keegan Milligan
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.781 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Laplante
New England College · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gordon Bell
SUNY Potsdam · 2000-01
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.