← New Search ↗ Social Card

Primo Self Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-11-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 51 12 25 37 0.726 0.2795 0.2795 1.0558 1.0558
2020-21 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 37 8 4 12 0.324 0.1913 0.1913 0.9740 0.9740
2021-22 Surrey Eagles BCHL 46 12 27 39 0.848 0.3267 0.3104 1.0010 0.9317
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Endicott D3 CNE SR 25 9 3 12 0.480
2024-25 Endicott D3 CNE JR 28 14 14 28 1.000
2023-24 Endicott D3 CNE SO 22 5 5 10 0.455
2022-23 Endicott D3 CNE FR 22 5 10 15 0.682
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2022-23 · Endicott
+156.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19357
Forward overall
#917
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.