IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Noonan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-01-28 Country: USA
2011 · Round 4, Pick #112  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
Signed Professionally
Krefeld Pinguine · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Vernon Vipers BCHL 58 2 16 18 0.310 0.1196 0.1205 0.4516 0.4551
2018-19 Krefeld Pinguine DEL 52 2 10 12 0.231 0.5770 0.6053 1.9568 2.0529
2019-20 Krefeld Pinguine DEL 52 5 15 20 0.385 0.9615 0.9615 3.2607 3.2607
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 34 4 16 20 0.588
2012-13 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 34 6 13 19 0.559
2011-12 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 38 16 11 27 0.711
2010-11 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 38 4 11 15 0.395
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2010-11 · Boston University
+246.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 18 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3271
Defenseman overall
#618
Defenseman born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2013-14
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Barrow
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Fox
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.