← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevan Kilistoff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Surrey Eagles BCHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.1284 0.1418 0.4848 0.5356
2012-13 Surrey Eagles BCHL 52 7 10 17 0.327 0.1260 0.1332 0.4754 0.5027
2013-14 Langley Rivermen BCHL 56 10 19 29 0.518 0.1995 0.2017 0.7532 0.7616
2014-15 Langley Rivermen BCHL 56 25 41 66 1.179 0.4541 0.4380 1.7142 1.6535
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SR 33 2 6 8 0.242
2017-18 Dartmouth D1 ECAC JR 28 6 6 12 0.429
2016-17 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 28 2 8 10 0.357
2015-16 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 30 3 3 6 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2015-16 · Dartmouth
-32.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17466
Forward overall
#671
Forward born in 1995
#745
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2009-10
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.