| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Surrey Eagles | BCHL | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.333 | 0.1284 | 0.1418 | 0.4848 | 0.5356 |
| 2012-13 | Surrey Eagles | BCHL | 52 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 0.327 | 0.1260 | 0.1332 | 0.4754 | 0.5027 |
| 2013-14 | Langley Rivermen | BCHL | 56 | 10 | 19 | 29 | 0.518 | 0.1995 | 0.2017 | 0.7532 | 0.7616 |
| 2014-15 | Langley Rivermen | BCHL | 56 | 25 | 41 | 66 | 1.179 | 0.4541 | 0.4380 | 1.7142 | 1.6535 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Dartmouth | D1 | ECAC | SR | 33 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.242 |
| 2017-18 | Dartmouth | D1 | ECAC | JR | 28 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.429 |
| 2016-17 | Dartmouth | D1 | ECAC | SO | 28 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.357 |
| 2015-16 | Dartmouth | D1 | ECAC | FR | 30 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0.200 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.