IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Robinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 3 1 4 5 1.667 0.5590 0.5983 1.5420 1.6503
2012-13 Langley Rivermen BCHL 55 9 33 42 0.764 0.2942 0.2996 1.1106 1.1310
2013-14 Langley Rivermen BCHL 44 15 27 42 0.955 0.3678 0.3576 1.3882 1.3496
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Penn State D1 BigTen SR 37 6 5 11 0.297
2016-17 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 26 3 1 4 0.154
2015-16 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 32 4 4 8 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2014-15 · Penn State
-12.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14116
Forward overall
#578
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aidan Radic
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
David Szmyd
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Robbie Murden
Hamilton · 2011-12
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.