IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dante Hahn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-15 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
EHC Freiburg · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 50 5 10 15 0.300 0.1156 0.1236 0.4371 0.4673
2013-14 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 48 7 9 16 0.333 0.1284 0.1314 0.4857 0.4969
2014-15 — BCHL 52 8 17 25 0.481 0.1853 0.1809 0.7006 0.6840
2015-16 — BCHL 50 12 24 36 0.720 0.2774 0.2560 1.0491 0.9681
2023-24 EHC Freiburg DEL2 45 5 11 16 0.356 0.4764 0.4405 — —
2024-25 EHC Freiburg DEL2 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.6698 0.5850 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 25 7 17 24 0.960
2019-20 Concordia (WI) D1 — SR 25 7 17 24 0.960
2019-20 Concordia (WI) D3 — SR 25 7 17 24 0.960
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 21 2 15 17 0.809
2018-19 Concordia (WI) D1 — JR 21 2 15 17 0.809
2018-19 Concordia (WI) D3 — JR 21 2 15 17 0.809
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 27 10 11 21 0.778
2017-18 Concordia (WI) D3 — SO 27 10 11 21 0.778
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 25 2 15 17 0.680
2016-17 Concordia (WI) D3 — FR 25 2 15 17 0.680
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2016-17 · Concordia
+251.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28759
Forward overall
#1131
Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Murfitt
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Frankie DeAugustine
UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cooper Board
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.