IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cade Penney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-03-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 31 0 2 2 0.065 0.0229 0.0249 0.0680 0.0738
2019-20 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 51 6 24 30 0.588 0.2090 0.2090 0.6204 0.6204
2020-21 — USHL 17 0 2 2 0.118 0.0694 0.0694 0.3521 0.3521
2021-22 Madison Capitols USHL 8 0 5 5 0.625 0.3687 0.3306 1.8711 1.6778
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wentworth D3 CNE — 13 1 1 2 0.154
2024-25 Wentworth D3 CNE — 22 2 4 6 0.273
2023-24 Wentworth D3 CNE — 26 1 6 7 0.269
2022-23 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19201
Defenseman overall
#2953
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Resch
Manhattanville · 2001-02
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Rozak
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.100 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Hudson
Manhattanville · 2008-09
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.