| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | St. Michael-Albertville | USHS-MN | 27 | 9 | 34 | 43 | 1.593 | 0.4287 | 0.4287 | 0.3868 | 0.3868 |
| 2020-21 | St. Michael-Albertville | USHS-MN | 19 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 1.000 | 0.2692 | 0.2692 | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Chicago Steel | USHL | 38 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.158 | 0.0971 | 0.1007 | 0.4652 | 0.4822 |
| 2022-23 | — | BCHL | 33 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 0.576 | 0.2145 | 0.2160 | 0.8390 | 0.8448 |
| 2023-24 | Salmon Arm Silverbacks | BCHL | 50 | 10 | 19 | 29 | 0.580 | 0.2160 | 0.2076 | 0.8451 | 0.8122 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Thomas | D1 | CCHA | SO | 18 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.333 |
| 2024-25 | St. Thomas | D1 | CCHA | — | 38 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0.289 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.