← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rylan Yaremko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-09-15 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Mount Royal Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 10 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 57 4 13 17 0.298 0.1149 0.1203 0.4340 0.4546
2015-16 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 56 13 21 34 0.607 0.2339 0.2325 0.8835 0.8780
2020-21 Mount Royal Univ. USports-M 0 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA JR 36 1 3 4 0.111
2018-19 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA 0 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 13 1 1 2 0.154
2016-17 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 39 1 5 6 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2016-17 · Northern Michigan
-13.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12093
Defenseman overall
#1708
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.