IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Murray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-09-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Everett Silvertips WHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Everett Silvertips WHL 52 5 22 27 0.519 0.2524 0.2818 1.2673 1.4150
2010-11 Everett Silvertips WHL 70 6 40 46 0.657 0.3195 0.3418 1.6038 1.7155
2011-12 Everett Silvertips WHL 46 9 22 31 0.674 0.3277 0.3334 1.6449 1.6736
2012-13 Everett Silvertips WHL 23 2 15 17 0.739 0.3594 0.3477 1.8040 1.7454
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Daniel Webster D3 — SO 25 9 7 16 0.640
2015-16 Daniel Webster D3 — FR 18 6 1 7 0.389
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2015-16 · Daniel Webster
+20.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#928
Defenseman overall
#304
Defenseman born in 1993
#686
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nate Repensky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Yale (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Yuel
Curry · 2005-06
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Berger
Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Hepler
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.