← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Murray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-09-27 Country: Canada
2012 · Round 1, Pick #2  ·  Columbus Blue Jackets Columbus Blue Jackets
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Everett Silvertips WHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Everett Silvertips WHL 52 5 22 27 0.519 0.2526 0.2820 1.2740 1.4225
2010-11 Everett Silvertips WHL 70 6 40 46 0.657 0.3197 0.3420 1.6123 1.7246
2011-12 Everett Silvertips WHL 46 9 22 31 0.674 0.3279 0.3336 1.6535 1.6824
2012-13 Everett Silvertips WHL 23 2 15 17 0.739 0.3596 0.3479 1.8135 1.7546
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Hamline D1 MIAC SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hamline D1 MIAC FR 25 0 7 7 0.280
2016-17 Daniel Webster D3 SO 25 9 7 16 0.640
2015-16 Daniel Webster D3 FR 18 6 1 7 0.389
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2015-16 · Daniel Webster
+20.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2545
Defenseman overall
#478
Defenseman born in 1993
#480
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2005-06
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.