icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | — | USHL | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.500 | 0.3184 | 0.3604 | 1.4984 | 1.6959 |
| 2010-11 | — | NTDP-U18 | 55 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.236 | 0.1880 | 0.1904 | 0.8854 | 0.8968 |
| 2011-12 | — | USHL | 60 | 5 | 22 | 27 | 0.450 | 0.2866 | 0.2965 | 1.3485 | 1.3952 |
| 2012-13 | — | OHL | 27 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 0.407 | 0.2431 | 0.2386 | 1.0552 | 1.0355 |
| 2013-14 | — | OHL | 66 | 5 | 20 | 25 | 0.379 | 0.2261 | 0.2103 | 0.9812 | 0.9127 |
| 2014-15 | — | OHL | 66 | 6 | 24 | 30 | 0.455 | 0.2712 | 0.2390 | 1.1772 | 1.0373 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Denver | D1 | — | FR | 19 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.210 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.