IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Meyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-09-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Edina High USHS-MN 25 1 16 17 0.680 0.0861 0.0798 0.1652 0.1531
2015-16 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 58 8 26 34 0.586 0.2259 0.2246 0.8531 0.8483
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 36 1 5 6 0.167
2018-19 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 36 1 7 8 0.222
2017-18 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 40 3 5 8 0.200
2016-17 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 28 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#6641
Defenseman overall
#1151
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Fink
Concordia · 2011-12
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andréas Fleutot
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Heintz
Adrian · 2017-18
1.179 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.