IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Reilly Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-07-23 Country: Canada
2017 · Round 7, Pick #217  ·  Pittsburgh Penguins Pittsburgh Penguins
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Oakville Blades OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 North York Rangers OJHL 47 17 18 35 0.745 0.1825 0.1956 0.5127 0.5495
2015-16 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 52 9 23 32 0.615 0.2371 0.2457 0.8956 0.9282
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 RPI D1 ECAC SR 34 8 14 22 0.647
2018-19 RPI D1 ECAC JR 33 5 13 18 0.545
2017-18 RPI D1 ECAC SO 37 7 6 13 0.351
2016-17 RPI D1 ECAC FR 35 2 13 15 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2016-17 · RPI
+101.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Wheeler
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Niles
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dave McKenna
Elmira · 2004-05
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.